SXMCV AXN QLP CHERRIE BLAZE GAYTAS GAYNT ACTGAY CANVAS FT EVOLUTION

Media Partners

Scene Pics

LATEST NEWS

Schoolboy beat killer "not homophobic"

A schoolboy who stabbed an autistic gay man to death was “not homophobic” according to a judge.

Mitcham dives in to help out on World AIDS Day

This year Matthew Mitcham will be selling red ribbons on the streets of Sydney.

'Subculture' no excuse for risky sex: judge

An HIV-positive man who faces up to 25 years in prison for attempting to infect others was part of a subculture of risky sex, a Melbourne Court has been told....

Freemasons return for Mardi Gras ’09

Freemasons, one of the stars of the 2007 Mardi Gras party, are set to return to the MG stage in 2009.

Anti-gay 'ambassador' dismissed

Ambassador axed after he refused to back down on anti-gay statements.

100%
-
+
7
Show options

Subscribe to Newsletter

Please register on this site to receive the weekly Evolution Online newsletter.
Evolution Newsletter
Please register to the site before you can sign for a list.
No account yet? Register
Keeping Abreast
Wednesday, 30 July 2008 22:35
It’s not a great time for women’s sexuality. The Sydney Morning Herald recently reported a story on a disturbing US trend that may be making its way to Australia, namely ‘purity balls’.

Girls from university age down to as young as four attend a formal function with their fathers who then make a pledge to keep their daughters ‘pure’. The pledge goes as follows: “I choose before God to cover my daughter as her authority and protection in the area of purity. I will be pure in my own life as a man, husband and father. I will be a man of integrity and accountability as I lead, guide and pray over my daughter and my family as the high priest in my home. This covering will be used by God to influence generations to come.”

Yep, the loony Christians are at it again. Not content with condemning queers, they seek to control girls’ and women’s sexuality. The balls come out of the thriving evangelical communities of Colorado Springs and while the girls do not make a pledge, it’s clear they are expected to comply with abstaining from sex before marriage. And get this quote by organiser Randy Wilson in The New York Times: “They are desperately waiting for us in a culture that lures them into the murky waters of exploitation. They need to be rescued by you, their dad.”

Pass the sick bucket, please! While this program may masquerade as an attempt to build healthy relationships between fathers and their daughters, the sexism is blatantly obvious: girls are inferior beings wholly incapable of making decisions for themselves and whose sexuality must be repressed. I doubt that conversations between father and daughter will include advice to use condoms should the daughter ‘slip’ out from underneath the halo of purity dad tries to smother her in. What if she realises she’s a lesbian? If she stays ‘pure’ until such time as she can marry her girlfriend in Canada or Massachusetts, does that count? Doubt it. What if, driven by hormones, the scent of freedom and a sense of wild abandonment, she decides to model for a menstruation porn site? What will the sight of his once innocent young princess now writhing around in her own period blood, sucking on a tampon freshly pulled from her warm vagina, do to the ‘father-daughter’ bond?

I’m all for girls being given guidance to avoid them being exploited: Encourage them to pose the question, ‘Is a tank top or free hat really enough of a payout for flashing my tits and arse and engaging in sexual behaviour for the makers of Girls Gone Wild who will make millions from immortalising my actions on DVD?’ Give them positive messages about their bodies, about their sexuality. Talk to them about how fabulous condoms are and to be assertive in getting their male partners to wear one. But trying to ensure they remain ‘pure’ is insulting and oppressive.

I am woman, hear me roar. Grrrr!

Katrina Fox

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it  

Comments (2)add comment
...
written by G Oliver , July 31, 2008

Russ...the trouble is purity is in the eyes of the beholder, or in this case, the father. So what act or what determination is made that the girl is pure or not pure? Smacks of a christian form of Sunni Islam to me. The 'christian ideals' that you talk about have been so warped from the original message that they don't really represent the truth anymore. Come on....can you truthfully say that you love all others and treat all others as you would have them treat you?
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0

...
written by Russ Jones , July 31, 2008

Katrina, I humbly suggest you are the one who may need to evaluate "sickness." You simply don't get it. Purity only has meaning to someone who understands the "Holy" and specialness of God ordained intimacy.

"Christians are at it again?" What is that supposed to mean. It is not like Christians all of a sudden created a movement in 2008. Christian ideals have been long in place before your birth and long after your death. Christ has survived the test of time - even if you don't agree.

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0


Write comment
smaller | bigger
password
 

busy