Login
No account yet? Register
So you think you can blog?

International

SfGloss
Queer Penguin PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 24 July 2008

NO CHILD OF MINE

You may not have known about Angela Shanahan until last Thursday’s episode of the ABC’s Q&A, in which she was drawn into a rather heated debate with gay journalist David Marr over the Catholic Church’s teachings on homosexuality.

But this was only one in a series of platforms from which Shanahan has launched her anti-gay views. A socially conservative columnist for hire who’s been published in most of the mainstream papers, one of her reccurring bugbears is equal rights for same-sex couples, particularly with regard to adoption. In Shanahan’s world, ‘lesbians and other single women who have deliberately chosen a lifestyle that reduces the role of the father to carefully chosen but anonymous sperm donor … gives the lie to the politically correct argument that anyone should be able to form a family’.

Furthermore, in opposing the ACT Stanhope government’s attempts to legislate for civil unions, Shanahan argued the proposed Act ‘was really about homosexual relationships. ... It is about sex. ... It is about a group of people who want their kind of sex accepted in the same way as most people’s brand of sex. The public is being bamboozled into accepting that it is the same as heterosexuality, therefore those relationships are just as good.’

Pretty meaty stuff, though some may argue it’s about what we’ve come to expect from conservative columnists opposed to equality and civil liberties. But what makes Shanahan stand out from the wailing wall of queer opponents is that she also happens to be the mother of a gay man. Of her nine children, elder son Brendan, also a columnist, is described as ‘the funny gay nephew of Bill Bryson’ in one review of his book, In Turkey I am Beautiful.

Of course, it’s perfectly possible that Brendan has a great relationship with his mother. But having read many of Angela’s anti-gay tirades over the years, it’s saddening that she appears to be allowing her dogmatic fervour to cloud judgment of her own child. I have never once read Angela write how proud she is of her gay son, or how he’s shown her the error of her ways. If anything, she seems more resolutely homophobic these days.

Indeed, I almost admire how militantly she has held the courage of her unfortunate convictions. From Janet Albrechtsen to Nancy Reagan and Dick Cheney, we’ve seen how some conservatives so easily let go of their parochial ‘pro-life’, homophobic, racist and/on misogynist agendas the moment it’s one of their loved ones who is begging to be euthanised, or requiring stem cells for physical recovery, or seeking to produce a family with their lesbian partner.

But not Angela Shanahan. A gay son appears to be just a tiny blip on her radar – perhaps one she’s successfully tuned out.

Sam Butler

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Comments (2)add comment
...
written by Louise L , 31 July, 2008

What a load of tripe! There is nothing we actually know about Angela Shanahan to inform us of whether or not she loves her son.

All we know is that like me and every other Catholic who accepts the Church's teachings (with good reason, I might add) she simply believes that sex is for a married man and woman and no one else.

There is nothing hateful about that.

Any parent can love their child, regardless of whether that child is doing right or wrong.


...
written by Jacob , 23 July, 2008

One wonders if her homophobia is so intense BECAUSE of her gay son, rather than in spite of it. Either way: I feel for the son.


Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

Out now

  • Current Issues
  • Current Issues
  • Current Issues
  • Current Issues
  • Current Issues
  • Current Issues

Sponsors

Syndicate

SX News